Quickly exit this site by pressing the Escape key Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
Date | Rank | Breach | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
13.12.2023 | Constable |
The Officer answered allegations that their conduct breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of ‘Discreditable Conduct,’ ‘Duties and Responsibilities’ and ‘Honesty and Integrity’ in that the officer failed in his duties to investigate a reported crime and in turn misled the victim into believing that the case had been referred to the Crown Prosecution Service. Furthermore, the officer misled a colleague into believing that he had attended a course as arranged, when in fact this was not the case. These allegations are contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2020. Accelerated Hearing – held in public. |
Dismissed w/o Notice |
28.11.2023 | Former Police Staff Member |
The former staff member answered allegations that their conduct breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of ‘Discreditable conduct’ and ‘Honesty and Integrity’ in that their conduct involved the repeated commission of criminal offences against children over an extended period and resulted in a lengthy prison sentence. |
The staff member would have been dismissed had they remained serving. |
24.11.2023 | Police Staff Member |
The staff member answered allegations that their conduct breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of ‘Discreditable conduct’ and ‘Work and responsibilities’ in that whilst on duty they accessed, for uncontrolled periods of time explicit adult material and exchanged messages on force technology. During the course of these exchanges the officer provided Police mobile telephone details thereby identifying himself as a member of the Constabulary. |
Dismissed w/o Notice |
27.10.2023 | Former Constable |
The former officer answered allegations that their conduct breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of ‘Authority, Respect and Courtesy’, ‘Discreditable Conduct’, ‘Equality and Diversity’ and ‘Duties and Responsibilities’ in that whilst off duty socialising with colleagues, the officer used racially inappropriate language, was discourteous towards his colleagues and behaved in a manner unbecoming of a police officer. Furthermore, the officer failed in his duties to properly investigate and record an allegation reported to him by a member of the public and was discourteous and threatening towards them. These allegations are contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2020. |
The officer would have been dismissed had they remained serving. |
26.07.2023 | Former S/Constable |
The former officer answered allegations that their conduct breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of ‘Discreditable Conduct’ in that whilst off duty, the officer was involved in a violent altercation in licensed premises. These allegations are contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2020. |
The officer would have been dismissed had they remained serving. |
24.07.2023 | Constable |
The officer answered allegations that their conduct breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of ‘Discreditable Conduct’ in that during a social event the officer was involved in an altercation with a work colleague, which resulted in them receiving a criminal conviction for common assault. |
Dismissed w/o Notice |
12.07.2023 | Former Police Staff |
The former staff member answered allegations that their conduct breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of, Honesty and Integrity, Authority, Respect and Courtesy, and Discreditable Conduct in that they abused their position of authority by having an inappropriate emotional/sexual relationship with a vulnerable member of the public. |
The staff member would have been dismissed had they remained serving. |
17.05.2023 | Former Constable |
The former officer answered allegations that their conduct breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of, Honesty and Integrity, Duties and Responsibilities, Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct in that they failed to investigate honestly and diligently a crime from another force that they had agreed to progress alongside Derbyshire offences. These allegations are contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2020. |
The officer would have been dismissed had they remained serving. |
04.05.2023 | Former Constable |
The former officer answered allegations that their conduct breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of, Honesty and Integrity, Duties and Responsibilities, Orders and Instructions and Discreditable Conduct in that;
These allegations are contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2020. |
The officer would have been dismissed had they remained serving. |
27.01.2023 | Former Constable |
The former officer answered allegations that their conduct breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of ‘Honesty and Integrity’ and ‘Duties and responsibilities’, in that, they failed to perform their duties expeditiously and diligently when attending a domestic incident. It is further alleged that they provided false and/or misleading information to a supervisor in respect of the aforementioned domestic incident. These allegations were contrary to the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2020. |
The officer would have been dismissed had they remained serving. |